Refiner due-diligence standards, mining standards, registers and market rules, each source-rated and stamped. The Schemes Compared matrix states only what the July 2026 crawl documented.
No living, neutral comparison of gold assurance schemes exists anywhere; the newest published comparison is a 2022 academic paper. The matrix below rebuilds one from primary sources. Where the crawl found nothing for a cell, the cell says so rather than guessing.
Schemes Compared
One matrix, primary-sourced.
Scheme
Who it covers
What it audits
Current version
Revision status
OECD alignment
EU CMR recognition
Gold-specific reach
Source
LBMA Responsible Gold Guidance
All gold Good Delivery refiners (mandatory)
Refiner supply-chain due diligence, OECD five-step aligned
v9 (Nov 2021, applies from FY2022)
v10 public consultation launched at the June 2026 LBMA summit (ASM Toolkit integration, recycled-gold definition, extended disclosures)
OECD five-step aligned
EC 2025 assessment: 89% on Section A, full on B and C, "partially aligned"; reapplication anticipated by summer 2026
66 gold refiners on the Good Delivery List (checked 2026-07)
Zero primary gold mines audited or in audit (2026-07-02); gold is by-product only at PGM sites, so IRMA is a benchmark and CoC framework, not certified gold supply
Refiner due-diligence standard, mandatory for all gold Good Delivery refiners and aligned to the OECD five-step framework; a v10 public consultation launched at the June 2026 LBMA summit. The EC’s 2025 Conflict Minerals Regulation assessment scored it 89% on Section A (full on B and C, "partially aligned"), with reapplication anticipated by summer 2026.
Transparency rules published December 2025 after a June-September 2025 consultation, effective 2026-01-01, two years early. Comply-or-explain disclosure of red-flag-location counterparties, WGC member mine suppliers, and all source countries.
Responsible Minerals Initiative·Edition / date 2017 · rev. 2023
Refiner audit standard released 2017-12-18, minor revision 2023-01-07. The first and only scheme recognised under the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation (Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/2071, adopted 2025-10-16); recognition covers RMAP-audited facilities only, not cross-recognised ones.
LSM mining standard launched September 2019; conformance is mandatory for WGC members, with annual ISAE 3000-type external assurance. Being superseded by the CMSI Consolidated Mining Standard; no standalone revision.
WGC + ICMM + Copper Mark + MAC/TSM·Edition / date not launched · 2026
Merger of four standards into one Consolidated Standard (24 performance areas; ~100 companies and ~600 operations anticipated). Final Consultation Report published 2026-03-12, still not launched as of 2026-07-03 (the H1 2026 target passed); a civil-society coalition (Public Citizen, Earthworks, NRGI, Oxfam and others) argues the standard is too weak, and CMSI has published responses.
Structure and timeline well corroborated; adequacy contested, both sides attributed
Mine-site ESG standard (400+ requirements, achievement levels Transparency/50/75/100); v2.0 draft 2 consultation closed 2025-10-22 with approval pending, Chain of Custody Standard v1.0 approved September 2024, ISEAL Code Compliant 2026-02-16. Zero primary gold mines audited or in audit as of 2026-07-02: gold appears only as a by-product at PGM sites, so for gold buyers IRMA is a benchmark and CoC framework, not certified supply.
66 gold refiners (checked 2026-07); entry requires at least 5 years of operation, 10 t/yr, GBP 15m net worth and Responsible Sourcing compliance. The Rules 2026 edition took effect 2026-01-01; the last gold addition was Shenzhen Yuexin (effective 2024-12-19, per the GDL Newsletter of April 2025).
Responsible Minerals Initiative·Edition / date checked 2026-07-02
94 conformant gold refiners: 37 RMAP-audited plus 57 cross-recognised via LBMA and RJC; 3 active (pending), all in Peru, and 2 flagged crude-gold refiners (counted from the live database on 2026-07-02).
Mutual-recognition agreement covering gold refiner audits, with annual origin-data exchange and grievance coordination. First announced in 2012, realigned to the OECD framework in 2017; policy v2 dates from September 2018.
Responsible Jewellery Council·Edition / date 2024 · eff. 2025-01-01
Jewellery-chain standards, both published 2024-12-10 and effective 2025-01-01 (the CoC updated its recycled definitions); around 2,000 member companies at its 2025 20th anniversary (RJC’s own figure, unaudited), of which about 1,644 are certified on the live member directory (roughly 1,396 COP-certified plus 390 COC-certified at year-end 2024, per the 2025 Annual Progress Report) — certified members are materially fewer than total members. An industry-only board; in April 2026 eight NGOs (HRW, IMPACT, Swissaid, The Sentry and others) publicly urged RJC to match LBMA DG3 transparency.
Membership figure per RJC, unaudited; governance adequacy contested
DMCC / UAE Ministry of Economy·Edition / date v2 · 2020
DMCC Rules for Risk Based Due Diligence, Version 2 (2020) (superseding v1.0 2016 and v1.1 2017; the v2/2020 date read from the rules PDF cover); the DGD list counts around 10 gold members including 3 UAE refineries (LBMA Spotlight on the UAE, undated chapter), and the standard is being folded into UAE Good Delivery. A 2016 OECD assessment found the programme not aligned (2018 re-assessment: most programmes in or close to alignment on standards, implementation gaps remain); Kaloti was removed from DGD in 2015.
Strong for history; DGD membership count from an undated LBMA chapter
IFSCA Good Delivery Guidelines 2025: a consultation for IIBX delivery with responsible-sourcing and CAHRA criteria. The consultation closed 2025-12-31; finalisation unconfirmed as of 2026-07.