Entry

WGC RGMPs & CMSI

A named programme or project with scope and membership, run across one or more countries.

TypeInitiative / programmeRelationships1Claims held1Checked2026-09First held2026-08

The Responsible Gold Mining Principles are a framework published by the World Gold Council setting out what constitutes responsible gold mining for consumers, investors and the downstream supply chain, developed with gold mining companies through two phases of external consultation. Companies implementing them must obtain external assurance from an independent third-party provider at site and corporate level and publicly disclose their conformance. The Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative is a separate joint effort of The Copper Mark, ICMM, the Mining Association of Canada and the World Gold Council to merge four standards, the RGMPs among them, into a single global mining standard.

Entry details
Initiative type
standards
How this entry is evidenced

Every claim below carries its own evidence standing. The hub publishes those standings and forms no single grade for the entry.

Corroborated1
This entry in the graph

Every relationship the hub holds for this entry, drawn once. An entry with three edges shows three edges.

administered by · As reportedWGC RGMPs & CMSI — Initiative / programmeWorld Gold Council — Industry association / private standard-setter
  • World Gold CouncilIndustry association / private standard-setter · administered by · As reported
Relationships

Showing 1 of 1

Where a source does not establish that a relationship continues, its present status is undetermined. An absent end date is not evidence that it is current.

Governance and compliance1

administered byWorld Gold CouncilIndustry association / private standard-setterCorroborated
As reported
Evidence (2)

Two or more independent sources state this.

SourceWorld Gold Council own standards page, corroborated by the Consolidated Mining Standard Initiative's own siteOrigingold-hubObserved2026-09Asserted2026-09-11

What the hub does not hold
  • No geography claim is held for this entry.
  • No events and evidence claim is held for this entry.
  • No participation and support claim is held for this entry.
  • No register identifier (RUC, NIT, cadastre code or equivalent) is held for this entry.

Not shown · SequenceFewer than two dated claims are held, so there is no sequence to read.

Not shown · AttributesNo attribute claim carrying its own source is held for this entry.

Not shown · Where sources disagreeNo source disagreement is noted on this entry.

Not shown · Also namedNo source has used a different name string for this entry.

Not shown · Register identifiersNo register identifier is held for this entry.

Where this entry comes from